I stayed over at a friend’s house to get up for an all-day hike. Early (way too early) the 3-year old sprung up and darted around the house buck-naked. My first thought was, “ARE YOU NOT COLD!?” And then I remarked with gladness that my friend and his wife had left the boy’s genitals intact despite American social pressure to mutilate in the medicalized ritual known as routine male infant circumcision. This cultural practice is a violation of the infant’s rights to bodily autonomy and bodily integrity.
Now, he (and his little brother) will have the choice. If he wants to permanently and irreversibly cut off part of his natural, intact penis, he can do so when he turns 18. In fact, he can cut off the whole thing if he wants. But a vanishingly small percentage of men choose to do this when they have fully informed consent and knowledge. And the ones that do are generally mentally ill.
In “Manwatching” by Desmond Morris, the esteemed anthropologist mentions circumcision in a lengthy chapter on body adornment, social mutilations, and cosmetic decorations. The passage goes:
“Despite these attempts, the only widespread forms of permanent body mutilation that still survive, apart from sailors’ tattoos, are the piercing of ears for earrings and the cutting off of the foreskin in the ritual of circumcision. Tribal mutilations, such as lip-plugging, tooth-filing, ear-stretching, and the removal of parts of the female genitals, have failed to find favor in the modern world. Circumcision is, in fact, the only really severe form of primitive mutilation to have resisted the modern trend towards abhorrence of body-violation. If, as used to be the case, it was performed at puberty instead of at infancy, that too would no doubt have vanished long ago, swept away by the outrage of the initiates. But the protests of babies are more easily ignored, and with the false accolade of medical hygiene to help it on its way, the genital deforming of young males continues unabated.”
Notably, the blurb on circumcision is preceded by a description of the practice of forced tattooing and scarring, and followed by a description of the practice of infant skull-squashing and female foot-binding.
“Manwatching” is one of my favorite books. It was written in 1977 and unfortunately non-therapeutic genital cutting of minors who cannot consent is still prevalent. However, wise and ethical parents like my friend are saying, “No, this practice is ridiculous and wrong,” and they are helping reduce the rate to less than 50% of baby boys. This practice of bodily mutilation cannot be eradicated soon enough.
About the photo
A sculpture in Seattle on a recent sunny day that made me think of how adults ought to protect the young and do better when they know better.

