– Stayed at Betty’s apartment over the weekend to be with the fam, since she died on Thursday, peacefully, though after a long ordeal of course. The funeral is on Tuesday, and my prof instructed me to send an email to the class alias to cancel it for that day, and I did. I’ll be a pallbearer. For comedic relief: my mom saw me naked when she tried to give me the towel I had forgotten in the hallway when I took a shower. Oh well; she changed my diapers until I was fifteen, anyways, so what’s the big deal?
– Went to Uncle Al’s retirement party at the church where he presided for 16 years.
– Drove back down to school in constant terror of spinning off the road due to snow and fast winds and fucking semis I hate semis.
– Saw a digitally rendered reconstruction of Dante’s face based on measurements of his skull made in the 1920’s (!). I had no idea his bones were still around. I must say, I wish for the sake of my imaginings while reading “Inferno” that he would be found to have looked like Gustave Dore’s engravings of him, traipsing toward the edge of the Styx to climb into Charon’s ferry, with that noble and grave look on his face.
– Went to a reading by the authors of “Deconstructing Tyrone: A New Look at Black Masculinity in the Hip-Hop Generation.” The two authors were journalists, and not only does the book offer nothing new (despite the title), but it also has nothing to do with the form of literary criticism known as deconstruction. It looks like it was just a tag thrown on a book which is mostly written in a conversational, lighthearted tone, despite the seriousness of the subject matter. The book is about black masculinity in the media, and with all the misogyny and fatherless kids and violence and gangbanging in America today, there is plenty of room to make a serious attempt at the relationship of black male media titans like rappers and professional athletes to some of those problems. Instead the authors, as I said, use “deconstruction” in the superficial sense that they make it more complicated than it at first seems; and they offer almost no insight or prescriptive analysis in the end. Furthermore, the authors made the whole Q&A session after the reading into a sort of media criticism event. Instead of talking about something substantive, the whole talk became a story-sharing event on Dave Chappelle, 50 Cent, and other current media favorites.
One thing I did like was that one of the authors was originally from the Caribbean, and she said passingly, towards the end, that post-colonial literature was a great place to go for insight on race in a country with a history of slavery, such as the United States. On that I totally agree. When I was in Martinique, my host dad gave me a book by Aime Cesaire – probably the most famous of the Caribbean authors – about the pathology that is instilled in the subjects of slavery. I just wish I had more time to read that stuff. Though a hundred years old or older, it is the freshest insight on what slavery does to the “collective psyche” of the oppressed, though I don’t like that phrase at all.